Comparison of unfilled and filled artificial turf
1. Surface temperature
Infill-free artificial turf usually has a lower surface temperature because it does not require black rubber granule infill, which absorbs heat in the sun and causes the temperature to rise. This feature allows infill-free artificial turf to provide athletes with a more comfortable playing environment in hot weather.
2. Environmental impact
As mentioned before, infill-free artificial turf has clear advantages in terms of environmental protection. The rubber particles used in filled artificial turf may cause pollution to the surrounding environment, especially when they are washed by rain and may enter the groundwater system.
3. Performance differences
While the two may be visually similar, infill-free artificial turf offers a different experience in terms of athletic performance. The elasticity of unfilled lawns mainly comes from the structure of the grass fibers themselves, while the performance of infilled lawns depends largely on the type and amount of filler.
4. Initial installation cost
The initial installation cost of unfilled artificial turf may be higher than that of infilled artificial turf because it requires a higher density of grass filaments and a more complex underlying structure to provide adequate support and resiliency. However, in the long run, lower maintenance costs and longer service life can partially or completely offset this cost difference.
Overall, fill-free artificial turf has shown significant advantages in the application of football fields and other sports venues due to its environmental friendliness, low maintenance cost, safety of use and stability and durability. As technology advances and market demand for environmentally friendly materials increases, fill-free artificial turf is expected to become the preferred solution for future sports facility construction.
